PUBLIC NOTICE – Pierceland Transfer Site CLOSED February 14th
FYI – The Pierceland Transfer Site will be closed today (February 14th). We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Thank-you for your patience.
Category: General Posts
PUBLIC NOTICE – RM OFFICE CLOSED ON FEB.19th – FAMILY DAY WEEKEND
Please be advised that the RM office will be closed for the family day weekend on Monday, February 19th. Regular office hours will resume on Tuesday, February 20th.
Thank-you!
PUBLIC NOTICE – UTILITY COMMISSION MEETING DATE – FEBRUARY 2nd
Please be advised that the next scheduled meeting for the Lac Des Iles Utility Commission has been changed to February 2nd, 2018 at 1:00 PM at the RM of Beaver River Office in Pierceland.
Thank-you!
PUBLIC NOTICE – DISCRETIONARY USE APPLICATION DENIED
Please be advised that the RM of Beaver River No. 622 Council has denied the development permit application to construct a private landing strip on SW-12-62-26-W3 due to section 307 of the Canadian Aviation Regulations, which requires the mitigation of consultation concerns raised through the notification period. Due to the location of this proposed landing strip, mitigation of concerns was not possible and thereby denied.
PUBLIC NOTICE – DISCRETIONARY USE APPLICATION
Please click on the link above for more details. This matter will be discussed at the regular council meeting held on January 18, 2018. If you wish to provide comments or concerns about this application please do so in writing by January 12, 2018.
PUBLIC NOTICE – SHORT TERM BORROWING
Public Notice is hereby given that at the January 18, 2018 regular meeting of council at the R.M. Office in Pierceland, Saskatchewan, the following topic will be discussed:
Short Term Borrowing – Grader Purchase
PUBLIC NOTICE: Special meeting via teleconference November 29th at 1:30PM
Agenda:
MREP (Municipal Roads for the Economy Program) Funding
Ombudsman Report – Conclusion
- While the council members had conflicts of interest in the matters before council, and did
not take the steps required to deal with the conflicts, we did not find any evidence that they
did so maliciously or with any intent to deceive ratepayers. - We found that these council members were not fully aware that the conflicts of interest rules
set out in The Municipalities Act applied to situations like these. Nor did they fully
understand the RM’s own Procedures Bylaw, or the requirements that they not participate in
these types of decisions, as set out it the RM’s Gravel Testing Policy. Their response to our
draft report confirmed this.